AYYAPPA S/O BASAPPA DODDAMANI v. KOPPAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WP/107871/2023 · 2025-03-24
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47701 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47701 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5350 WP No. 107871 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107871 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. AYYAPPA S/O BASAPPA DODDAMANI, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
2. RAMALINGAPPA S/O BASAPPA DODDAMANI, AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
3. VIRUPAKSHAPPA S/O BASANNA HADAPAD, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
4. MAHALINGAPPA S/O BASAPPA DODDAMANI, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
5. VISHWANATH S/O BASAPPA DODDAMANI, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
6. SIDRAMAPPA S/O BASAPPA DODDAMANI, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
7. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O BASAPPA DODDAMANI, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
8. RENAVVA W/O GAVISIDDAPPA DODDAMANI, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
9. UMADEVI W/O SIVAGANGAPPA MARADI, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
ALL ARE R/O: MITTIKERI STREED, NEAR GARADI HOUSE, KOPPAL, DIST: KOPPAL-583 231. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAYA S. HALLIKERI, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5350 WP No. 107871 of 2023
AND:
1. KOPPAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY PRESIDENT, B.C. PATIL LAYOUT, HOSAPETE ROAD, KOPPAL-583 231. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY COMMISSIONER, B.C. PATIL LAYOUT, HOSAPETE ROAD, KOPPAL-583 231. 3. AL-AMAN EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST KOPPAL, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, ASHA BUILDING, BEHIND LIC OFFICE, VALMINKI BHAVAN ROAD, KOPPAL, DIST: KOPPAL-583 231. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR R. GUNJALLI, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R2;
SRI. RAMACHANDRA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NANDISH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Mrutyunjaya S.Hallikeri., counsel for the petitioners, Sri.Rajashekhar Gunjalli., counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri.Ramachandra Bhat., counsel on behalf of Sri.Nandish Patil., for respondent No.3 have appeared in person. - 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5350 WP No. 107871 of 2023
2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking following reliefs:
1. Issue, Writ, Order or Direction, in certiorari by quashing the resolution passed in the meeting held on 21.12.2022 under Subject No.65(4) by the respondent No.1 Vide Annexure-E to allot, Plot No.105 of Sy.No.418 situated at Koppal, Tq: and Dist: Koppal, to respondent No.3. 2. Consequentially, declare that, the lease deed executed on 10.01.2023 with respect to Plot No.105 in Sy.
No.418 situated at Koppal, Tq: and Dist: Koppal, by the respondent No.2 in favor of respondent No.2 as illegal and void, vide Annexure- F.
3. Issue, Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of mandamus by directing the respondent No. 1 and 2 to allot Plot No.105 in Sy.No.418 situated at Koppal, Tq: and Dist: Koppal, by duly following the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities (Allotment of Civic Amenity Sites) Rules, 1991. - 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5350 WP No. 107871 of 2023
3. Sri.Rajashekhar Gunjalli., counsel submits that a memo has bee filed and the same may be placed on record. Submission is noted. Memo is placed on record. 4. Sri.Ramachandra Bhat., counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the first respondent has cancelled the allotment made in favor of the third respondent by an order dated 06.11.2024. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for respondent No.3 and the memo is placed on record. 5. A careful perusal of the order reflects that on 06.11.2024, the allotment made in favor of the third respondent was cancelled. Hence, nothing survives for consideration at this juncture to accord the prayer. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK/MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 60