- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4745 WP No. 106617 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 106617 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: D. RAMESH BABU S/O. D. VENKATA DASAPPA, AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O . PLOT NO. 30, WARD NO. 17, K.V.T. NAGAR, VENKATESHWARA NEAR, 3RD CROSS PATEL NAGAR, BALLARI-583101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH V. BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND: THE TEHSILDAR BALLARI REVENUE TALUK, BALLARI. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR A DIRECTION OR AN APPROPRIATE ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 19.08.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND RECTIFY RECORD OF RIGHTS OF LAND SY.NO.81/11 OF B. GONAL VILLAGE IN BALLARI TALUK AND REDUCE THE TOTAL EXTENT FROM 00.12.75 CENTS TO 00.09.95 CENTS. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4745 WP No. 106617 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court seeking issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing respondent to consider the request made in the representation dated 19.08.2024 filed by the petitioner, produced as per Annexure-F and to rectify the record of rights of the land of the petitioner. 2. Heard Sri Girish V Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T. Hanumareddy, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent. Perused the materials on record. 3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that he was the owner of the land measuring 12.75 Cents in Sy.No.81/11 of B.Gonal Village, Ballary taluk. Since he relinquished his right in respect of 2.80 Cents in favour of the Government, his name is to be mutated in the revenue records in respect of 9.95 cents. In that regard, he has submitted a representation dated 19.08.2024 to the respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, similar direction was issued by this Court in the petitions filed by the adjacent owners making similar prayer. The said - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4745 WP No. 106617 of 2024 submission is not disputed by the learned Additional Government Advocate but on the other hand, he concedes the same. Under such circumstances, I do not find any reason to reject the prayer made by the petitioner. Hence, I proceed to pass the following: ORDER (i) The petition is allowed. (ii) Respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 19.08.2024 as per Annexure-F and pass appropriate orders in the light of the approved layout plan. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE MKM CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8