CHENNAM HARINATH REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/28678/2024 · 2025-05-04
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47698 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47698 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:;AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE j PRESENT ‘ THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28678 OF 2074 Between: Y.S.R. Kadapa District’ Village, Kamalapuram Mandal, Nadipi Obul F D.No.2/22 Yerragudipadu Village Kadapa District. ^ Reddy, Aged about 42 years, R/o Kamalapuram Mandal, Y.s.R. years, R/o Y.s.R. Kadapa ...Petitioners AND-
2. The District Collector, Y.S.R. [ Jow ^^Pedntending Engineer, Water Kadapa, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. r^Mwi ^^Qineer, Water Resource (Mylavaram Reserve Canal) Division Y.s.R. Kadapa District Kadapa District, Kadapa. Resource Department (Irrigation) Department (Irrigation), MRC Mylavaram Dam side, Mylavaram
Irrigation Development Corporation Limited (APSIDC Ltd.), Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing DirectorSrd N?*R Distric[*^ Estate, Prakasham Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada,
6. The Executive Engineer, APSIDC Project Office Kadapa District.
Kadapa, Y.S.R. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing Proceedings No SE/IC/KDP7TS/WUA 2024/684 M, dt.21-10-2024 Elections proposing to conduct elections for Water Users Association (WUA) for Mylavaram Canal System by including/adding farmers of 2200 Acres of Kokatam I and II the which is given to the 5th Respondent under Kokatam Lift Irrigation Scheme in Kamalapuram Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Farmers Management of Irrigation System Act (Act No.11/1997) and rules made thereunder, violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16, 21 and 300A of Constitution and consequently set aside the Proceedings No SE/IC/KDP/TS/WUA Elections 2024/684 M, dt.21-10-2024 by difecting the 2nd Respondent to delete the farmers of 2200 Acres, which is tranded over/given to the 5th Respondent from the voters list of Mylavaram Canal System and proceed elections exclusively for Mylavafam Canal System to conduct lA NO: 1 OF 2Q7d Petition under Section 151 GPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent under Proceedings No SE/IC/KDP/TSA/VUA Elections 2024/684 pendency of this Writ Petition M, dt.21-10-2024 during
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 4, 5, 6: GP FOR IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT Counsel for Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI M DHANA RAJU The Court made the following: Order
APHC010549302024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28678/2024 Between: Chennam Harinath Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1 .A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR IRRI ANDCAD 3.MALLIPUDI DHANA RAJU SC for APIDC Ltd.
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: ...RESPONDENT(S)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dosed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO deputy registrar 'l //TRUE COPY// To.
SECTION (51TICER
1. One CC to SRI A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 2- FOR IRRGIATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
4. One CC to SRI M DHANA RAJU, Standing Counsel for APIDC
5. Three CD Copies [OPUC] 1 gsg i’- a it ■■i'*
HIGH COURT DATED: 05/05/2025
ORDER WP.No.28678 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS