Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 208
Ram Karan
Mahavir Singh, IAS, Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana and another
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA
proceedings against the respondent 18.1.1995 Court in CWP State of Haryana and others”
counsel for the petitioner that persons similar dismissed vide order dated 24.7.2024 (Annexure R COCP-2045 and another” with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the speaking COCP-1417-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1417 of 2023
Date of decision : Ram Karan Versus Mahavir Singh, IAS, Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana and another
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 18.1.1995 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-11738-1988 titled as “Sh. Vidya Nand and ot State of Haryana and others”.
At the very outset, it is very fairly submitted by learned unsel for the petitioner that similar contempt petitions filed by similarly situated as the present petitioner, have been dismissed vide order dated 24.7.2024 (Annexure R 2045-2013 titled as “Om Parkash and others vs. G. Anupama and another” with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the speaking
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1417 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-01.09.2025 …..Petitioner Mahavir Singh, IAS, Additional Chief Secretary to Government …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Vikram Singh, Advocate Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this 1988 titled as “Sh. Vidya Nand and others vs. At the very outset, it is very fairly submitted by learned similar contempt petitions filed by situated as the present petitioner, have been dismissed vide order dated 24.7.2024 (Annexure R-1) passed in 2013 titled as “Om Parkash and others vs. G. Anupama and another” with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the speaking VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.05 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
order passed in accordance with law
Report dated 24.4.2025 filed by the respondents by way of affidavit of Dr. Vivek Aggarwal, Director General Element Haryana, Panchkula on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, in which it has specifically been mentioned that had already dismissed all the contempt petitions (which were listed on 24.7.2024) filed in terms of judgmen
judgment dated 24.7.2024 (Annexure R titled as ‘Om Parkash and others vs. G. Anupama & another’…..”.
petitioner as in COCP Anupama and another”.
September 01 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
COCP-1417-2023 (O & M)
order passed by the State by availing any other and alternative remedy in accordance with law.
This fact has been mentioned in para 4(ii) of the Status Report dated 24.4.2025 filed by the respondents by way of affidavit of Dr. Vivek Aggarwal, Director General Element Haryana, Panchkula on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, in which it has specifically been mentioned that “ii. The Hon’ble High Court had already dismissed all the contempt petitions (which were listed on 24.7.2024) filed in terms of judgment dated 18.1.1995 vide its
judgment dated 24.7.2024 (Annexure R-1) in COCP No.2045 of 2013 titled as ‘Om Parkash and others vs. G. Anupama & another’…..”.
Therefore, it is submitted petitioner that the present petition may be d as in COCP-2045-2013 titled as “Om Parkash and others vs. G. Anupama and another”.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 01, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 by availing any other and alternative remedy This fact has been mentioned in para 4(ii) of the Status Report dated 24.4.2025 filed by the respondents by way of affidavit of Dr. Vivek Aggarwal, Director General Elementary Education, Haryana, Panchkula on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, in which it
“ii. The Hon’ble High Court had already dismissed all the contempt petitions (which were listed on t dated 18.1.1995 vide its 1) in COCP No.2045 of 2013 titled as ‘Om Parkash and others vs. G. Anupama & another’…..”. by learned counsel for the that the present petition may be disposed of in similar terms 2013 titled as “Om Parkash and others vs. G. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.05 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document