APHC010115352021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7382/2021 Between: 1. JALADI. SIVAPARVATHI,, S/O.VENKATESWARLU, AGED 50 YEARS, DO-13.9.54. POLIMERA ROAD, VISHNAVI AVENUE, CHIRALA POST AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523155 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. JALADI AYYAPPA, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,(PRESENT ADDRESS NOT KNOWN) PERIMENT ADDRSS- DO-13-9-54. POLIMERA ROAD, VISHNAVI AVENUE, CHIRALA POST AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523155. 5. KOPPURAJU SRIKANTH, S/O SAMBASIVARAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O HARIPRASADNAGAR, CHIRALA POST AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT- 523155 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents No 3 in in not registering the FIR basing on the police report dt.03.12.2020 against the respondents No. 4 to 5 for the offence U/s.379,420 R/w.34 and 109 IPC is illegal, arbitrary, violation of the provisions of 154 Cr.P.C. apart cum Article 14, 19, 21 and 309 of Constitution of India consequently direct the respondent No.3 to register FIR against the respondent Nos.4 to 5 basing on the police report dt.03.12.202 and conduct investigation as per the provisions of the criminal procedure code and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 to register the FIR basing on the police report dated. 03-12-2020 against the respondents No.4 to 5 for the offence U/s. 379, 420 R/w. 34 and 109 IPC and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7382/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents No 3 in not registering the FIR basing on the police report dt.03.12.2020 against the respondents No. 4 to 5 for the offence U/s.379,420 R/w.34 and 109 IPC is illegal, arbitrary, violation of the provisions of 154 Cr.P.C. apart cum Article 14, 19, 21 and 309 of Constitution of India consequently direct the respondent No.3 to register FIR against the respondent Nos.4 to 5 basing on the police report dt.03.12.202 and conduct investigation as per the provisions of the criminal procedure code and pass…” 2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. The present Writ Petition is of the year 2021. It appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.09.2025 UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7382 of 2021 Dated.24.09.2025 UPS 195 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8972/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein in taking necessary action against the 4th respondent who is 5th respondent herein, in torturing the petitioner by beating black and blue while in police custody without following procedure under Criminal Procedure Code more particularly not following procedure contemplated under 41-A Cr.P.C., before arresting a person under offences punishable within 7 years as per the guidelines of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and clear violation of procedure under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and pass…” 2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. The present Writ Petition is of the year 2021. It appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.09.2025 UPS 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.8972 of 2021 Dated.24.09.2025 UPS 38