Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47694 (RAJ)

KALU SINGH S/O SUKHDEV SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14047/2025 · 2025-11-24

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47527] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14047/2025 1. Kalu Singh S/o Sukhdev Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ratna Bhopa Ka Badiya, Udaipur Road, Chungi Naka, Beawar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 2. Naresh Singh S/o Sukhdev Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ratna Bhopa Ka Badiya, Udaipur Road, Chungi Naka, Beawar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya UR Rahman For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 24/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 105/2024 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar District Beawar for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 475 and 120B IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the applicants are sole bread earner of their family aged 26 and 30 years. Further, it is submitted that offences are triable by Magistrate and applicants are in custody ever since 07.10.2025. There are no criminal antecedents registered against the [2025:RJ-JP:47527] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14047/2025] applicants. It is further submitted that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicants are sole bread earner of their family; that the matter is triable my Magistrate; that accused-applicants are in custody ever since 07.10.2025; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicants and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants 1. Kalu Singh S/o Sukhdev Singh & 2. Naresh Singh S/o Sukhdev Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/11