SRI GULAPPA S/O MALLAPPA KORI v. SRI LAXMAN S/O SHIVAPPA TOTAGI
WP/103445/2023 · 2025-03-18
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47687 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47687 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4913 WP No. 103445 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 103445 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI. GULAPPA S/O MALLAPPA KORI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/AT. HULIYAL, TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT. …PETITIONER (BY MISS. AMRUTHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MRUTYUNJAYA TATA BANGI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI LAXMAN S/O SHIVAPPA TOTAGI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/AT. HULIYAL TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT, NOW AT RABAKAVI, TQ. RABAKAVI BANAHATTI, DIST. BAGALKOT. 2. SRI SHIVAPPA S/O RAMAPPA TOTAGI, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/AT. RABAKAVI, BEHIND BRAHMANAD TEMPLE, TQ. RABAKAVI BANAHATTI, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 301. 3. SMT. MALLAWWA W/O SHIVAPPA TOTAGI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/AT. RABAKAVI, BEHIND BRAHMANAD TEMPLE, TQ. RABAKAVI BANAHATTI, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 301. 4. SRI RAMU S/O SHIVAPPA TOTAGI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4913 WP No. 103445 of 2023
R/AT. RABAKAVI, BEHIND BRAHMANAD TEMPLE, TQ. RABAKAVI BANAHATTI, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 301. 5. SMT. BHARATI W/O SANGAPPA BILLUR, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/AT. RABAKAVI, BEHIND BRAHMANAD TEMPLE, TQ. RABAKAVI BANAHATTI, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANT.S.KADADEVAR., AND SRI. D.M.JATTI., ADVOCATES FOR R1; R2-DECEASED;
R3-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
R4-NOTICE NOT CLAIMED;
R5-NOTICE IS REFUSED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Miss.Amrutha., counsel on behalf of Sri.Mrutyunjaya Tata Bangi., for the petitioner and Sri.Prashant S.Kadadevar., and Sri.D.M.Jatti., counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. 2. Counsel for petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4913 WP No. 103445 of 2023
placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. 5.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 19