Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47686 (RAJ)

NARESH KUMAR S/O RAM CHANDER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17670/2025 · 2025-11-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47323] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17670/2025 Naresh Kumar S/o Ram Chander, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Gadhra, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khanp For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar and Mr. S.M. Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy.GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners while referring order dated 08.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8348/2023 submits that the controversy in this case is no more res integra and the matters be disposed of in accordance with order dated 28.05.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10548/2023 (Sudarshana Jangid Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr.) and order dated 03.02.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12131/2023 (Pratap Ram Vs. [2025:RJ-JP:47323] (2 of 2) [CW-17670/2025] State of Rajasthan and Anr. & other connected petitions) passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submits that these writ petition be disposed of on basis of principle of law as already settled by this Hon’ble Court in referred judgment, if the petitioner is squarely covered from the issue raised herein. 3. Having regard to the submissions of learned counsel that this writ petition falls within the ambit of principle laid down in the aforesaid judgments, therefore, it is hereby directed that the principle of law as extended in aforementioned writ petition shall be equally applicable in the writ petition and these writ petitions are disposed of in same terms as expressed in Sudarshana Jangid Vs. State (supra) and Pratap Ram Vs. State (supra). 4. Accordingly, the writ petition and misc. application(s), if any stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /24