PRAVEEN GARG S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA GARG v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/1343/2025 · 2025-10-30
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47684 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47684 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1343/2025 Praveen Garg S/o Shri Harish Chandra Garg, R/o 51, Basant Vihar, Scheme No. 3, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Robin Jhiriwal S/o Shri Kamal Kumar Jhiriwal, R/o C-783, Budh Vihar, Shivaji Park, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S.Hora Mr. T.C.Sharma Mr. Himanshu Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta-PP Mr. Naman Yadav JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 30/10/2025
1. Matter comes upon an application (I.A No. 1/2025) seeking quashing of FIR No. 819/2021 registered with Police Station Kotwali, Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
2. Counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel for the complainant are in agreement that several criminal disputes were pending between the opposite parties and they have settled their disputes and now all the matters have been decided on the basis of the compromise. Counsel submits that the alleged offences are of personal nature and now the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioner, hence the FIR registered against the
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1343/2025] petitioner with the Police Station Kotwali, Alwar be quashed and set aside on the basis of compromise.
3. Per contra, Learned Public prosecutor opposed the prayer but counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant admitted the factum of compromise between the parties.
4. The authorized representative of the society is present in person who has been duly identified by his counsel and submitted that he has no objection with the quashing of the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 819/2021.
5. Considering the above factum of compromise arrived at between the parties and applying the principles of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688, this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 BNSS.
5. Application stands allowed for the reasons stated therein.
6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed. Proceedings arising out of impugned FIR No.819/2021, registered with Police Station Kotwali Alwar, for the offences under Sections 379, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, against the petitioner stands quashed and set-aside.
7. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/222