APHC010741042016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13977/2016 Between: 1. KILLARI SURENDRA BABY S/O. SUBRAMANYAM KILLARI, OCC: STUDENT R/O. H.NO.1-23, GUNTHAPALLI POST AND VILLAGE BADEEL MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY FOR EXTERNAL AFFAIRS , NEW DELHI. 2. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, NEAR PRASANTH THEATRE CLOCK TOWER , SECUNDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ or direction more particularly one on the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents in Insisting the petitioner to get the declaratory decree from the civil court vide Leter No. OBJ/302362151/15 dt 10.02.2015 for correction of date of birth as 06.05.1988, instead of 22.04.1984 in passport NO. F- 1874416 as per SSC as arbitrary, illegal and also violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to renewal the passport by rectifying the correct date of birth as 06.05.1988 in pass port No. F-1874416, 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 17448 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to consider the application dated 8.06.2014 for correction of the date of birth pending disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 128999 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 5 OF 2016(WPMP 156584 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Despite the matter being posted today i.e., on 17.09.2025 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. Even on 10.09.2025, 03.09.2025 and 13.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. Therefore, it appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 17th September, 2025 cbn 4 177 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.13977 of 2016 17th September, 2025 cbn