1 2025:CGHC:54465 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6048 of 2023 1 - Jagjeevan Lal Pradhan S/o Shri Lobo Ram Pradhan Aged About 42 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) And Posted As Govt. Primary School Podapara, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 - Chandrika Pradhan W/o Shri Jagjeevan Pradhan Aged About 42 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kandekala, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - Rupsingh Yadav S/o Shri Asharam Yadav Aged About 44 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Mungapadar, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Parmeshwar Banjare S/o Lakhanlal Banjare Aged About 42 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Khudbudi, Block Mainpur District Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Rupesh Kumar Manjhi S/o Shri Raj Kumar Manjhi Aged About 47 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Saragiguda, Block Mainpur District Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Santoshi Patel W/o Santosh Patel Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Rawaninghi Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Panchayat Department Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 5 - Joint Director Education Division Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07.11.2025 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena