APHC010099042008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 33/2008 Between: 1. PADARTHI RAVI KUMAR, S/O.P.S.PRAKASA RAO BUSINESS R/O.D.NO.29-1-19, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA-2 ...APPELLANT AND 1. PADARTHI VEERA VENKATA JAYALAKSHMI NAGAMANI, W/o.P. Ravi Kumar Bank Employee R/o. Flat No.105, Matha Enclave, Coco Cola Street, ...RESPONDENT Appeal is filed seeking to set aside the order dated 8.1.2007 passed in O.P.No.334 of 2003 and allow the present appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 368 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 185 days in representing FCA SR No.17610 of 2007 before this Hon'ble Court IA NO: 2 OF 2007(FCAMP 369 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 58 days in filing the appeal. IA NO: 3 OF 2007(FCAMP 370 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with original decree in O.P.No.334 of 2003 dated 8.1.2007 on the file of the Learned Family Court-cum- IV Additional District & Sessions Judge Court, Vijayawada. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(FCAMP 13170 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. RAJANIKANTH JWALA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. G VIDYA SAGAR The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.33 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) This matter underwent several adjournments without appearance of the learned counsel for the appellant. Thereafter, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the appellants9 counsel is no more. Then, on 24.09.2025 this Court issued notice to the appellant through the Registry. But, the said notice was returned with an endorsement that 8no such addressee in this address9. 2. Under these circumstances, in our considered view, it appears that appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal. 4. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Dated: 19.11.2025 TM THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.33 of 2008 Dt.19.11.2025 tm