Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47670 (KAR)

SRI ARUNKUMAR S/O VEERABHADRAPPA NALATAVAD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/103250/2024 · 2025-03-25

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5524 CRL.P No. 103250 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103250 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. ARUNKUMAR S/O. VEERABHADRAPPA NALATAVAD, AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: PROPRIETOR, OF SHREE GURU KRUPA AGRO FOODS, R/O: APMC YARD, B-203, NEAR SAMUDAY BHAVAN, GANGAVATI, DIST: KOPPAL – 583 227. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINAND A. PACHHAPURE & SRI. RAJENDRA R. PATIL, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH MUNIRABAD POLICE STATION, NOW REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, AT DHARWAD – 580 011. 2. SRI. RAVICHANDRA S/O. RUDRAPPA HALEGOUDAR, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: FOOD INSPECTOR (REVENUE), OFFICE OF TAHASILDAR, KOPPAL, DIST: KOPPAL – 583 231. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH B. CHIGARI, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SE. 482 OF CR.P.C. (U/S. 528 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO REGISTRATION OF FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO. 201/2023 (MUNIRABAD P.S.) REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 3 AND 7 OF ESSENTIAL Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5524 CRL.P No. 103250 of 2024 COMMODITIES ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPAL, ORDER SHEET, FIR AND COMPLAINT MARKED AT ANNEXURE-A, B AND C RESPECTIVELY INSOFAR AS PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 IS CONCERNED AND GRANT ANY OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file fresh petition. 2. Memo reads thus; “It is respectfully submitted before this Hon’ble Court that the above petition is filed challenging the FIR & Complaint wherein now the investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed. Hence, petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above petition with a liberty to file fresh petition challenging the charge sheet, in the interest of justice.” 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56