Lakkireddygari Shamindhar Reddy v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/8782/2021 · 2025-09-23
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47660 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47660 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010156732021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8782/2021 Between:
1. LAKKIREDDYGARI SHAMINDHAR REDDY, SLO. L.SUDHAKAR REDDY,
BETWEEN. AGED 44 YRS., OCCUPATION. CONTRACTOR, R/O. H.NO. 2-141, JULEKALLU VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDUR POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, GUDUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. K SATHYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. BHAGAWANTH REDDY, AGED 60 YRS., RIO. JULEKALLU VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 2nd to 4th for
2
not taking any action on petitioner complaint dated 24-11-2020 and 25-11- 2020 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of fundamental rights and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take action against the 5th respondent as per law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere for construction of free mineral water supply plant in petitioner's open site situated in Sy.No. 95 at Julekal Village, Gudur Mandal, Kurnool District pending disposal of the writ petition pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2.
GP FOR REVENUE
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8782/2021 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 2nd to 4th for not taking any action on petitioner complaint dated 24-11-2020 and 25-11-2020 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of fundamental rights and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take action against the 5th respondent as per law and pass…”
2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. As can be seen from the proceeding sheet dated 29.04.2021, it is represented by the then learned Assistant Government Pleader that a crime has been registered on the complaint of the petitioner vide Crime No.316 of 2020 against the respondent No.5 and others. Investigation is also completed. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required in this petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.09.2025 UPS
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.8782 of 2021
Dated.24.09.2025
UPS
191