5? m wno X A IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATlX^^^ FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 639 OF 2025 Petition under Sections 10 tg,^ of Contempt of Courts Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon ithe respondents and to punish them for willful and intentional violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court WP.No. 18154/2021 dated 28.04.2023 under Section Contempt of Courts Act 1971 passed in 10 and 12 of Between: A. Ganapathi Babu, S/o :Laite!^^Ramalingam, Aged Enforcement Superintendent (Retd) Prohibition and Excise R/o D. No.371, K.L.Puram, Revenue Colony, Opp 54,Cantonment Post Vizianagaram District -53500 63 years. Asst. Department, Ward Sachivalayam ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. Sri Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS, Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. o' ■ . 2. Nisanth Kumar, IAS,, Director, Prohibition and Excise Commissionarate 3rd Floor. IHC Corporate Building, Mangalagiri. Andhra Pradesh 522503. ...CONTEMNORS Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. Harinath Reddy Somagutta Counsel for the Respondents: Sri.G Raju For RR1,2 The Court made the following Or^br: ■ 'i w w J APHC010114312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 639/20?^ 0E0 [3330] RAO Between: A. Ganapathi Babu ...PETITIONER AND Mukesh Kumar Meena IAS and another ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.G RAJU The Court made the fnllnwinr|- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO. 639 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order, dated 28.04.2023 of this Court passed in W.P.No.18154 of 2021 has been complied with by the respondents. On earlier occasion also learned counsel represented the same and as there is no representation for the petitioner, this Court directed to list the matter today under caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner today also. Therefore, the Contempt Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. SD/- E. KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS, Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Nisanth Kumar, I.A.S, Director, Prohibition and Excise Commissionarate 3rd Floor, IHC Corporate Building, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh 522503. 3. One CC to Sri. Harinath Reddy Somagutta, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. G Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies YM AL HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER -e fi H AUG 2025 ° eo, vX.v Current ;>ecuon , ^ CC.No.639 of 2025 THE CONTEMPT CASE IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION