2025:KER:28546 Con.Case(C)No.735 of 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 735 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.02.2025 IN WA NO.1737 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/APPELLANT: C.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR AGED 68 YEARS S/O. CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, SREE KRISHNA BHAVAN, KIZHAVOOR, MUKHATHALA P.O, KOLLAM, PIN - 691577 BY ADVS. PRATHEESH.P ANJANA KANNATH(K/939/2014) SAFNA P.S.(K/1429/2023) RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1: DR.SHARMILA MARY JOSEPH IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY WOMEN & CHILD DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001 BY ADV ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA V.TEKCHAND, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:28546 Con.Case(C)No.735 of 2025 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 28th day of March, 2025 Nitin Jamdar, C.J. Heard Ms.Safna.P.S., learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr.V.Tekchand, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the State. 2. The learned Senior Government Pleader has drawn our attention to the memo filed, pointing out that the judgment and order passed by this Court is complied with. The Petitioner-in-person has now engaged an Advocate, who also confirms that the judgment and order passed by this Court is complied with. 3. In light thereof and considering the fact that the delay occurred because the State had challenged the order, we are not inclined to proceed further in the contempt jurisdiction. 4. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Nitin Jamdar Chief Justice Sd/- S. Manu Judge vgd/29.03.25