Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47648 (PAT)

Ishwar Chandra Thakur @ Ishwar Chandra Vishwakarma v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/2600/2024 · 2025-03-17

Rajiv Roy

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2600 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2020 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Ishwar Chandra Thakur @ Ishwar Chandra Vishwakarma Son of Late Jainandan Thakur Resident of village- Pakari, Police Station- Dumariaghat, District- East Champaran 2. Abhay Chandra Thakur @ Abhay Chandra Vishwakarma Son of Late Jainandan Thakur Resident of village- Pakari, Police Station- Dumariaghat, District- East Champaran ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Akash Baitha Son of Gariban Baitha Resident of village- Pakari, Police Station- Dumariaghat, District- East Champaran .. ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Shrinath Manjhi, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 17-03-2025 Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant duly assisted by Mr. Shrinath Manjhi and Mr. Sadanad Paswan, learned APP. 2. The appeal has been filed:- “against the order dated 31.3.22 passed by Spl. Judge Sc/ST Act East Champaran in Dumariaghat P.S case no.40/20 where by where under the learned court has taken cognizance for offence u/s 341/323/324/307/504/506/34 IPC and 3(1)(a) (r) (s) of the SC/ST Act. of the SC/ST and Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2600 of 2024(5) dt.17-03-2025 2/2 issued summon against appellants.” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall be approaching the Court at an appropriate time and for the present, would like to withdraw the same. 3. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. perwez (Rajiv Roy, J) U T