Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47647 (CHH)

VIDYA CHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8303/2023 · 2025-11-13

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:55703 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8303 of 2023 Vidya Charan Singh Son Of Dutiya Singh, Aged About 47 Years R/o. Government BDI Colony, Bhagalpur, District - Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary - Tribal And Scheduled Caste Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Commissioner, Tribal And Scheduled Caste Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Jashpur, District - Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Collector, Jashpur, District - Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Singh Rathore, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 14.11.2025 1. The present petition has been filed with the following relief(s) :- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be please to set aside the order dated 31-05-2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by the respondent No.1, in the larger interest of justice. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.11.18 13:34:12 +0530 2 10.2 That, the Hon'ble High Court may kindly direct the respondent authority to adjust/alter his post from the post of Driver to the post of Assistant Grade-III. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favor of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, as such the present writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State concurs with the said submission. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh