APHC010572392003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10370/2003 Between: 1. M.C. KARUNAKAR, CLERK-CUM-CASHIER, R/O. PRODDATUR, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE C GOVT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ANOTH, TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER, M- 2 BLOCK, MANORANJAN COMPLEX, M.J. ROAD, HYDERABAD -1. 2. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGION IV, ZONAL OFFICE, CUDDAPAH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in L.C.I.D. No. 260 of 2001, and issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari, and quash the Order passed by the 1st respondent in L.C.I.D. No. 260 of 2001, dated 16-12-2002, published on 7-2-2003, in so far as directing the District Collector, Cuddapah to conduct the enquiry as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, perverse and without jurisdiction. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 3398 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in wp 10370 of 2003 dt 3-7-03 2 IA NO: 3 OF 2003(WPMP 13034 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Award passed by the 1st respondent in L.C.I.D.NO. 260 of 2001, dated 16-12-2002, published on 7-2-2003, in so far as giving directions to the District Collector, Cuddapah to conduct enquiry. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 11.09.2025 and 11.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 191 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:10370 of 2003 Date: 25.09.2025 MP