Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1784 OF 2014 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the present criminal revision case by setting aside the order dated 26-03-2014 in F.C.O.P.No. 1096 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Judge Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Visakhapatnam. Between: Dhanala Appala Raju S/o Suryanarayana, aged 52 years, Occ: Driver, APSRTC, Staff No. 484339, Simhachalam Depot, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner / Respondent AND
1. D.Bangaramma W/o Appalaraju, Aged 29 years, R/o. Thota Garuvu Konda, Arilova, Visakhapatnam.
2. Dhanala Meenakshi, D/o. Appalaraju, Aged 8 years, being Minor, rep. by her mother & Natural guardian i.e. 1®* Respondent R/o. Thota Garuvu Konda, Arilova, Visakhapatnam.
3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 'i- 'it ...Respondents / Respondent K 9 Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
✓ APHC010748652014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1784/2014 Between: Dhanala Appala Raju, Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONER AND D Bangaramma Visakapatnam 2 Otrs Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT{S) I 1.ASCBOSE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) $ The Court made the following:
ORDER: The report from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam, is received, appending with a letter addressed by Dhanala Bangaramma, W/o. Appalaraju/respondent No.1, and the affidavit of the petitioner/Dhanala Appala Raju, S/o. Suryanarayana, stating that they would not prosecute this Criminal Revision Case, which is pending before this Court. The respondent No.lAA/ife submits that whatever the maintenance she was entitled, the petitioner/husband has settled.
2 Dr. YLR, J CrI. R. C. No. 1784 of 2014 ^ H Dated 05.05^2025 In the affidavit submitted by the petitioner, he states that the compromise was affected in LSA.No.2079 of 2021 in F.C.O.P.No.774 of 2015 and LSA No.2080 of 2021 in F.C.O.P.No.1096 of 2010, dated 21.12.2021.
2. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case can be disposed of as
3. compromised. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is
disposed of as
4. compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To.
1. The Judge Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Visakhapatnam.(with records)
2. One CC to Sri A. S. C. Bose, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi.
5. Three CD Copies PR Cnr
\ HIGH COURT DATED:05/05/2025
ORDER CRLRC.No.1784 of 2014 DISPOSING THE CRLRC AS COMPROMISED