Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47640 (PNJ)

VEERPAL KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/3915/2025 · 2025-04-22

Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CRWP-3915-2025 Date of decision:22.04.2025 Veerpal Kaur & another ... Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab & others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR. Present: Mr. R.K. Kachura, Advocate for the petitioners. ... SUKHVINDER KAUR, J. (ORAL). Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of private respondents No.4 to 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major, petitioner No.1 – Veerpal Kaur, aged 21 years and petitioner No.2 – Sukhwinder Singh, aged 26 years and have got married on 15.04.2025, against the wishes of their family members, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 6. The copies of 'Aadhaar' card of petitioners (Annexures P-1 and P-2) have been placed on record. Marriage certificate as well as the marriage photographs have also been placed on record as Annexure P-3 and P-4. It has been further submitted that the private respondents are threatening to interfere in the marital life of the petitioners. Hence, they are Jyoti 2025.04.22 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-3915-2025 -2- seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court Mr. Inderjeet Singh Ladher, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, the petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 18.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) at the earliest and take necessary steps, if any required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 22.04.2025 harjeet Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No Jyoti 2025.04.22 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document