G LANKESHA S/O LATE BASAVARAJ G v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/103494/2025 · 2025-06-10
Pradeep Singh Yerur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47640 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47640 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7496 WP No. 103494 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 103494 OF 2025 (GM-PDS) BETWEEN:
G. LANKESHA S/O. LATE BASAVARAJ G., AGE ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: NIL, RESIDENT OF SIDDAPUR VILLAGE, TQ: KUDLIGI, DISTRICT: VIJAYANAGAR-560040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR B. HALLI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS LEGAL METROLOGY DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, VIJAYANAGAR, DISTRICT: VIJAYANAGAR-560040.
3.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, VIJAYANAGAR, DISTRICT: VIJAYANAGAR-560040.
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, VIJAYANAGAR, DISTRICT: VIJAYANAGAR-560040.
5.
THE TAHASILDAR, KUDLIGI, TQ: KUDLIGI, DISTRICT: VIJAYANAGAR-560040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA)
CHANABASAPPA K KALLUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD
BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7496 WP No. 103494 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 BEARING NO. ¸ÀA:D£Á¸À/£Áå¨ÉCA/C£ÀÄ/04/2025-2026 DATED 29.04.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned AGA is directed to take notice for the respondent Nos.1 to 5.
3. Petitioner is the son of the original licence holder, Basavaraj G. The licence was renewed from time to time and it was valid till 31.12.2025. After the death of original licence holder, petitioner made a request application along with necessary documents on 21.04.2025 to the authorities to transfer the licence in his name.
4. Petitioner’s father was authorised and licenced to distribute essential commodities at the fair price shop at
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7496 WP No. 103494 of 2025
Siddapur village, Kudlagi taluk from the year 1996. The petitioner’s father died on 25.03.2025. Hence, the petitioner submitted an application dated 21.04.2025 to the respondents requesting for transfer of authorisation and requested to issue licence in her favour. Respondent No.4 without considering the provisions of the Karnataka Essential Commodities Licensing
Order, 1986 and Karnataka Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Control Order, 1992 and several orders passed by this Court, rejected the request on the ground that the petitioner is aged person, not completed SSLC and not produced income certificate as per Clause 13 of the Control Order.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on similar orders in similar situation passed by this Court in W.P.No.103733/2024, W.P.No.100048/2024 and in W.P.No.13559/2020 and connected matters. It is relevant to mention that in several writ petitions, this Court has already decided that age and passing SSLC shall
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7496 WP No. 103494 of 2025
not be a bar for transfer of licence on compassionate ground. Under the circumstances, the petitioner would be entitled to favourable order.
6. Learned AGA representing the State sustains the order passed by the authority and submits that in the alternative if this Court were to agree to the contention of the petitioner, the application so made, would be considered, in accordance with law.
7. Placing the submission on record, I pass the following:
ORDER i. Petition is allowed. ii. A writ of certiorari is issued. The impugned endorsement dated 29.04.2025 bearing No.SUM/ANASA/NYABEAM/ANU/04/2025-26 issued by respondent No.4 vide Annexure-e is hereby quashed.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7496 WP No. 103494 of 2025
iii. A writ of mandamus is issued directing the respondent No.4 to consider the representation/ application of the petitioner on compassionate ground by showing leniency without applying restrictions as contemplated under the Control
Order 2016. The said application shall be considered in a time bound manner not later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
KGK CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47