% IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 29833 OF 2024 Between: Dandu Narasimha Raju, S/o D.Krishnam Raju, aged 67 years, R/o at D.No. 10-1-9/1, Aakruthi Apartments. Fiat No. D4. Sampath VInayaka Temple Road, VIP Road, CBM Compound. Asilmetta, Visakhapatnam, (Represented by his GPA Holder) Sagi Venkata Satya Narayana Raju, S/o S.Butchi Appala Satyanarayana aged 51 years, residing at D.No.3- 20, Raja Veedhi, Thatituru, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Development, Secretariat Building, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City, 3. The Station House Officer, Arilova Police Station, Visakhapatnam City. 4. Tetala Kavitha Reddy, W/o Veera Raghava Reddy, Aged about 50 years R/o D No 53-24-23/1, Chaitanya Nagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. 5. T. Rami Reddy, S/o Linga Reddy, Aged about 59 years, R/o D No 53- 24-23/1, Chaitanya Nagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. 6. Velagala Lakshmi Tulasi, W/o Venkata Krishna Reddy Aged about 44 years, R/o 12-28/1, Savaram Colony, Anaparthi, Anaparthi Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3'"'^ respondent in interfering in civil matters between the petitioner and the 4 th th and 5 r > respondents in O.S. No. 376 of 2024 on the file of VII Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Visakhapatnam as illegal arbitrary and violative of provisions of Constitution of India and settled legal principles and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes and do not entertain request made by and 5*^ respondents which fall in civil nature. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'^ respondent not to interfere with the Civil issue between petitioner and unofficial respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M V S ANIL KUMAR R Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents: M/s PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondents: SRI DEVARAPALLI SAIRAM PRASAD The Court made the following order: r APHC010570892024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] , '' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 29833/2024 Between: 1.DANDU NARASIMHA RAJU, .S/0 D.KRISHNAM RAJU, AGED 67 YEARS,R/0 AT D.NO. 10-1-9/1, AAKRUTHI APARTMENTS. FIAT NO. D4. SAMPATH VINAYAKA TEMPLE ROAD, VIP ROAD, CBM COMPOUND. ASILMETTA, VISAKHAPATNAM, (REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER) SAGI VENKATA SATYA NARAYANA RAJU, S/0 S.BUTCHI APPALA SATYANARAYANA AGED 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.3-20, RAJA VEEDHI, THATITURU, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT HOME BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARILOVA POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 4.TETALA KAVITHA REDDY, W/0 VEERA RAGHAVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/0 D NO 53-24-23/1, CHAITANYA VISAKHAPATNAM. MADDILAPALEM NAGAR, 2 5.T RAM! REDDY, S/0 LINGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 CHAITANYA NAGAR, YEARS, R/0 D NO 53-24-23/1 MADDILAPALEM,VISAKHAPATNAM. 6.VELAGALA LAKSHMI TULASI, W/0 VENKATA KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/0 12-28/1, ANAPARTHI, ANAPARTHI REDDY SAVARAM COLONY, MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M VS ANIL KUMAR R Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.PILLIX LAW FIRM 3.DEVARAPALLI SAIRAM PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION N0.29833 OF 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief; “...to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3'"^ respondent in interfering in civil matters between the petitioner and the 4^ and respondents in O.S. No. 376 of 2024 on the file of VII Additional Civil Visakhapatnam as illegal Judge (Senior Division) at arbitrary and violative of provisions of Constitution of India and settled legal principles and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes and do not entertain request made by 4^ and 4^ respondents which fall in civil nature and pass... Sri Vijay Kumar K, learned counsel representing Sri M.V.S. 2. Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home and Sri 3. P.Jithendra, learned counsel for respondent No.4/Pillix Law Firm are in attendance. 4. Permission is accorded. IP* 4 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. " There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. Sd/-SHAIK MOHD RAF! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to Sri M V S Anil Kumar R, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Devarapalli Sairam Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to M/s Pillax Law Firm, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT 5. Two CD Copies RAM I HIGH COURT DATED:13/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.29833 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS