Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47637 (RAJ)

SANJAY JOSHI S/O GORDHAN JOSHI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17976/2025 · 2025-11-24

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47750] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17976/2025 1. Sanjay Joshi S/o Gordhan Joshi, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Brahapuri Ke Bahar, Bhakranion Ka Mohalla Merta City, Dist. Dist. Nagaur. At Present Posting Gps Deh, Block Mertacity, Dist. Nagaur. 2. Dau Lal Paldiya S/o Jai Ram Paldiya, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Gaguda, Post Daghwara,via Mertacity, Dist. Nagaur Raj. 3. Farid Khan S/o Mohammad Ali, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Sangam Vihar Colony, Mertacity, Dist. Nagaur, At Present Posting Ggups Indawar, Dist. Nagaur. 4. Bhura Ram S/o Chota Ram, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Vpo Langour, Tehsil Degana, Dist. Nagaur Rajasthan. At Present Posting Gsss Paliyas, Block Degana, Dist. Nagaur. 5. Dana Ram S/o Shobha Ram, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Kutiyasani Khurd, Tehsil Degana, Dist. Nagaur, At Present Posting Gsss Mithriya, Block Degana, Dist. Nagaur. 6. Gumana Ram Meghwal S/o Ramu Ram Meghwal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Vpo Suwadiya Via Role, Dist. Nagaur, At Present Posting Gsss Dugastau, Block Jayal, Dist. Nagaur. 7. Mustak Deen S/o Ghinsu Khan, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Vpo Jaroda, Tehsil Merta City, Dist. Nagaur At Present Posting Ggsss Arwar, Dist. Nagaur. 8. Bhugana Ram S/o Bhau Ram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Igyar, Tehsil Jayal, Dist. Nagaur, At Present Posting Gsss Arwar, Dist. Nagaur. 9. Basti Ram Bidiyasar S/o Narayan Ram Bidiyasar, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Roopathal, Tehsil Jayal, Dist. Nagaur, At Present Posting Gsss Palri Jodha, Dist. Nagaur. 10. Datar Singh S/o Jalam Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Sarsanda, Tehsil Degana, Dist. Nagaur, At Present Posting Gups Rawaliyawas, Dist. Nagaur. 11. Badarilal Bhati S/o Dula Ram Bhati, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Nimbri Chandawatan, Dist. Nagaur, At Present Posting Gsss Makodi, Dist. Nagaur. 12. Gopal Jarawata S/o Toda Ram, Aged About 57 Years, R/o [2025:RJ-JP:47750] (2 of 4) [CW-17976/2025] Village Chandpura, Dist. Didwana-Kuchaman At Present Posting Gsss Charnwas, Dist. Didwana-Kuchaman. 13. Ramniwas Jat S/o Ghasi Ram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Chandpura (Jilaya), Dist. Didwana-Kuchaman At Present Posting Gsss Aspura, Dist. Didwana-Kuchaman. 14. Basta Ram S/o Heera Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Barunda, Dist. Jodhpur, Last Posting Gsss Pundlu, Dist. Nagaur. 15. Jassa Ram Badiyar S/o Likhama Ram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Badgaon, Tehsil Mertacity, Dist. Nagaur. At Present Posting Gsss Pundlu, Dist. Nagaur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Department Of Education, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner 3. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner 4. The Joint Director, Education Department, Ajmer Zone Ajmer. 5. The District Elementary Officer (Secondary/elementary), Nagaur. 6. The District Elementary Officer (Secondary/elementary), Didwana-Kuchaman. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhraj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: 1. It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ [2025:RJ-JP:47750] (3 of 4) [CW-17976/2025] petition of the petitioners may kindly be allowed: - A. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, may kindly be direct the respondents to grant to petitioners summer vacation dues payment date of initially appointment at the respective period and the petitioners by counting their service from the date of their initial appointment with all consequential benefits; B. BY an appropriate writ, order or direction, that the said controversy already covered in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek (Supra) C. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. D. Writ petition filed by the petitioners may kindly be allowed with costs.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 10.07.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13104/2025 “Kavita Solanki Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Kavita Solanki (supra) passed by this Court, on the basis of judgments in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan: S.B. CWP No. 3534/2009 decided on 20.01.2014. [2025:RJ-JP:47750] (4 of 4) [CW-17976/2025] 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Kavita Solanki (supra) and Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. The State of Rajasthan: SBCWP No. 3534/2009 on 20.01.2014 with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /205