Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47636 (PNJ)

DALJIT RAJ v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/20823/2025 · 2025-04-22

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 140 DALJIT RAJ STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab MANISHA BATRA CRM-15746-2025 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Main case 1. The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short respondents No. the agricultural land (Annexure P-3). 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner ha Senior Superintendent grievances as mentioned considered and no action has this stage, the petitioner would to respondent No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Abhishek K. Kathpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) 2025 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) No.2 and 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner to harvest the agricultural land and to take action on their representation dated 20.04.2025 ). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner has recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, Pathankot ( mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate d respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.20823 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.04.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya ‘BNSS’) for directing the official provide police protection to the petitioner to harvest their representation dated 20.04.2025 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted recently filed a representation on 20.04.2025 before the Pathankot (Annexure P-3) raising his petition but the same has not yet been been taken thereon. He further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued of Police, Pathankot to decide the Bharatiya the official provide police protection to the petitioner to harvest their representation dated 20.04.2025 submitted before the his petition but the same has not yet been further submitted that at irections are issued decide the Jyoti 2025.04.23 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h 5. In view of the limited p commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. 22.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.20823 of 2025 (O&M) aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 20.04.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. rayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-3) of the petitioner within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No necessary action who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the rayer made by the petitioner, without disposed the aforesaid ioner within a accordance with Jyoti 2025.04.23 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document