AJIT ALIAS BANIYA S/O DAMODAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14536/2025 · 2025-11-10
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47635 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47635 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44937] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14536/2025 Ajit Alias Baniya S/o Damodar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Neem Basai, Police Station Kotwali Dholpur (Rajasthan) (Presently In Central Jail, Bharatpur) ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Devashish Pancholi For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 10/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 243/2025 registered at Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 260(A), 261, 262, 265, 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of PDPP Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant is aged 20 years. It is submitted that there are allegations against the applicant is that while being in the Bal Sudhar Grah (reformative home) in collusion with the co-juvenile the applicant escaped, when the police authorities/guards were not guarding the said area properly. It is submitted that he is in custody ever-since 09.05.2025. It is submitted that co-accused persons are already enlarged on bail, and the present applicants’
[2025:RJ-JP:44937] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14536/2025] plea is rejected for the reason that there are criminal antecedents registered against him. It is submitted that nature of offences are bailable except of 61 of BNS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Heard and considered. 5. In the case in hand and considering the age of the applicant, as he is juvenile who at that time was residing in reformative home; that co-accused person has been enlarged on bail; but without commenting anything on merits or demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail, howsoever, on account of 21 antecedents, registered against the applicant, the following additional conditions are imposed: 5.1 That he shall mark attendance before the concerned jurisdictional Police Station on 5th date of every month at 11:00 A.M. 5.2 That as an extended interpretation of the provisions of 'community service' as enshrined under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, and as a reformative approach to re-include the accused- applicant back in the society with a better vision, aim and zeal in life, this court deems it fit to impose an ancillary condition upon the applicant, therefore, it is directed that the accused-applicant shall contribute to the Swach Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of two months from the date of enlarging on bail, on two hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative authorities concerned. [2025:RJ-JP:44937] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14536/2025]
6.
[2025:RJ-JP:44937] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14536/2025]
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ajit Alias Baniya S/o Damodar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/230