Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47629 (RAJ)

MAHESH S/O SHRI NABALSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9608/2025 · 2025-11-13

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45660] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9608/2025 Mahesh S/o Shri Nabalsingh, R/o Bhagna, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur (Raj.). (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain with Mr. Udit Sapra For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 13/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.64/2025 registered at Police Station Kaulari District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 85, 80(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is the sole bread earner of the family and has no criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that the marriage was solemnized in the year 2022 and that a child was born out of the wedlock, who is only three months old presently and is currently living with the applicants’ parents. It is also submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take a long time. It is further submitted that the deceased committed suicide on account of the applicants’ alcoholism and liquor [2025:RJ-JP:45660] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9608/2025] addiction. It is further submitted that no domestic complaint was ever registered prior to the incident. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. It is submitted that on account of applicant’s role, death has occurred. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, the fact that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family surviving with three months old child and nobody is there to look after the child; that the parents of the applicant is old and illiterate; that the applicant is not having any criminal antecedents; that the charge-sheet has been filed and there is not any domestic complaint prior to the incidence and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Mahesh S/o Shri Nabalsingh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /26