APHC010346912021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21016/2021 Between: 1. BELLALA TAVITIRAJ, ,S/O. JOGARAO, D.NO 16-193/A,ROTARY NAGAR, KASIBUGGA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SCRETARY,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIAKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KASIBUGGA POLICE STATION,KASIBUGGA. SRIAKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. DOKI JEEVAN, S/ O DOKI MALLESWARARAO, C/O SRI VIJAYALAXMI GANESHA MODERN RICE MILL, MELIAPUTTI ROAD,TEKKALI, SRIAKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21016 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 3rdrespondent in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art. 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and 4threspondent to settle the issues and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and pass such.…= 2. Heard Sri Kanakala Devi Prasannakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim Order passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 dated 23.09.2021, the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. He would further submit that the respondent police are not calling the petitioner to the police station, since no crime has been registered against him. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 3 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station, in absence of any crime registered against him. The police are further directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.10.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21016 of 2021 Dated.16.10.2025 UPS 159