[2025:RJ-JP:48052] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17522/2025 1. Amit Kumar Pandya S/o Keshav Lal Pandya, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Vpo Gamra Brahmaniya, Tehsil Sagwara District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. 2. Giriraj Singh Chouhan S/o Prahlad Singh Chouhan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Plot No. 70, Shiv Colony, Sadar Thana Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan. 3. Prashant Joshi S/o Ramesh Chandra Joshi, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Vpo Kanba, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. The Dy. Director, Secondary Education, Udaipur Division, Udaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 26/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “(i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, respondent be directed to amend the selection year of petitioners on the post of Senior Teacher (English) as 2011-12 or 2012- 13 instead of 2013-14. (ii) By an appropriate order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents may kindly be directed to conduct the review DPC by [2025:RJ-JP:48052] (2 of 3) [CW-17522/2025] including the name of petitioners and thereby promote them on the post of Lecturer by considering the selection year of petitioners on the post of Senior Teacher as 2011-12 or 2012-13 instead of 2013-2014. (iii) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent may kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner as law laid down by this Hon’ble High Court in case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. CWP No. 1665/2024) decided on 02.02.2024. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:48052] (3 of 3) [CW-17522/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /112