APHC010276142021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 16146/2021 Between: 1. SRI SRI SRI RAMA SATYANARAYANA SWAMY TEMPLE, ALLINAGARAM VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT REP BY ITS TRUSTEE SMT. VURITI SATYAVATI, W/O BHARGAVI PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O ALLINAGARAM VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM, 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM 4. THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, DRDA COMPLEX, SRIKAKULAM 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ (PRI), ZP COMPOUND, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 7. THE TAHSILDAR, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 8. THE ALLINAGARAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, ALLINAGARAM VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents No. 2 to 8 herein in trying to lay the CC Road and Drain in the petitioner's land situated in Sy No. 159-10 to an extent of Ac 0.14 cents of Chilakapalem Revenue Village, Allinagaram Gram Panchayat, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District without initiating the proceedings under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act No. 30 of 2013) is not legal and the same is violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, and without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the possession and enjoyment of the land situated in Sy No. 159- 10 to an extent of Ac 0.14 cents of Chilakapalem Revenue Village, Allinagaram Gram Panchayat, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District for laying of the CC Road and Drain and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including laying of the road in the petitioner's land situated in Sy No. 159-10 to an extent of Ac 0.14 cents of Chilakapalem Revenue Village, Allinagaram Gram Panchayat, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 5 & 7 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the 8th respondent. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 8 in trying to lay the CC road and drain in the petitioner’s land situated in Sy.No.159-10 to an extent of Ac.0.14 cents of Chilakapalem Revenue Village, Allinagaram Gram Panchayat, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District without initiating the proceedings under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 7th respondent dated 14.10.2025 submits that the said proposal of laying the road was withdrawn and the revenue authorities are not proceeding further to lay a road on the subject land. 4. In view of the above said instructions of the 7th respondent and the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition, as no cause survives. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The written instructions of the 7th respondent dated 14.10.2025 shall be 4 made as part of the court record. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 25.11.2025 NNN