APHC010539592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27978/2025 Between: 1. NANDIMANDALAM KRISHNA REDDY, S/O BALASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 1-2-48-1-9, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NAGARJUNA HOMES BACKSIDE, NEAR SANGAMITRA SCHOOL, KUKATPALLI, HYDERABAD, PRESENTLY R/O NARAHARIPURAM VILLAGE, N.ANANTAPURAM POST, CHAPADUMANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MYDUKURU, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHAPADU POLICE STATION, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT 6. NANDIMANDALAM SUBBA REDDY, , S/O BALASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCBUSINESS, R/OPLOT NO.69/A,ROAD NO.2. NEAR RELIANCE APARTMENT, WEST MAREDUPALLI,SECUNDERABAD, HYDERBAD, O/O M/S S.R.V.S 2 INDUSTRIES, B-8, CO-OPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BALNAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANAGANA STATE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents especially Respondent No.4 in calling the petitioner herein to the police station without there being any FIR and in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the Respondent No.6 and forcing the petitioner herein not to file any appeal and civil suits against the respondent no.6 herein is perse illegal, arbitrary, unfair apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station without following due procedure established by law and further not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the respondent no.6 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official respondents especially respondent no.4 not to harass the petitioner by calling them to the police station and not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents without following due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27978/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents especially Respondent No.4 in calling the petitioner herein to the police station without there being any FIR and in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the Respondent No.6 and forcing the petitioner herein not to file any appeal and civil suits against the respondent No.6 herein and forcing the petitioner herein not to file any appeal and civil suits against the respondent No.6 herein is perse illegal, arbitrary, unfair apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station without following due procedure established by law and further not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the respondent no 6…= 2. Heard Sri V.Nitesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Police are calling the petitioner to the Police Station without any crime registered against him. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint of respondent No.6, the petitioner was called to the Police Station and the matter is under preliminary enquiry. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the complaint made 4 by respondent No.6 against the petitioner. The Police are further directed not to interfere in the civil dispute between the parties except under due process of law. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.10.2025 JLV 5 215 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27978 of 2025 Dated: 16.10.2025 JLV