Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47614 (AP)

P. Papamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/4027/2021 · 2025-09-24

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010064052021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4027/2021 Between: 1. P. PAPAMMA,, W/ O. LATE P. PERAYYA, AGED ABOUT 75YEAR, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/ O. TIRUCHANURU HARIJANA WADA, TIRUPATHI RURAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI RURAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents and their officials in trying to dispossess the Petitioner from her land admeasuring in 1.26 cents in Sy.No. 338/9. Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupathi Rural, Chittoor District, for the purpose of giving pattas under Navaratnalu Scheme. as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice, violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Responde.lts not to 2 interfere and not dispossess the petitioner from the subject land and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from land admeasuring in 1.26 cents in Sy.No. 338/9. Tiruchanu:u Village, Tirupathi Rural, Chittoor District., and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim orders dt. 19-02-2021 in W.P.No. 4027/2021 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents and their officials in trying to dispossess the petitioner from her land admeasuring in 1.26 cents in Sy.No.338/9 Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupathi Rural, Chittoor District for the purpose of giving pattas under Navaratnalu scheme. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter of the 3rd respondent submits that the petitioner is not in possession of the subject land and it is classified as village site gramakantam and the government can utilize the same for any of the public purpose. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 & 3 are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of 1.26 cents in Sy.No.338/9 Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupathi Rural, Chittoor District strictly in accordance with law if so warranted for any public purpose and if not already used by now for the above said welfare scheme for the poor. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 25.09.2025 NNN