RAVINDRA S/O TUKARAM SHEDAGE v. UTTAM S/O HANAMANT SAVANT
MFA/102048/2016 · 2025-10-17
Chillakur Sumalatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47610 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47610 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14086 MFA No. 102048 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102048 OF 2016 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SHRI RAVINDRA S/O. TUKARAM SHEDAGE, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, COMMISSION AGENT(NOW NIL), R/O: SHIVAJI GALLI, CHANDGAD TQ: CHANDGAD, DIST: KOLHAPUR,
…APPELLANT (BY SRI. B.M. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SHRI UTTAM S/O. HANAMANT SAVANT, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: PLOT NO.129/B, 7TH CROSS, VEERABHADRA NAGAR, BELAGAVI, MATRU KRUPA.
2.
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14086 MFA No. 102048 of 2016
MAHADEV PLAZA, CTS NO.10719, SY.NO.135/4, NEAR KOLLAPUR CIRCLE, NEHRU NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590 018.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAGARAJ C. KOLLOORI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD IN M.V.C.NO.1493/2011 DATED 10-12-2015 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL BELAGAVI, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL BY ENHANCEMENT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14086 MFA No. 102048 of 2016
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
No representation on the appellant’s side on call. There was no representation on the appellant’s side even on 09.10.2025 and 15.10.2025. Though the matter is list under the caption ‘for dismissal’, yet there is no representation on this day. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
RH CT-MCKList No.: 1 Sl No.: 10