Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4761 (GAU)

Lokam Tatup and Anr v. The State of AP and 4 Ors

WP(C)/392/2024 · 2025-02-20

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040011692024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/392/2024 Lokam Tatup and Anr power of attorney holder of M/s L T Enterprise, resident of Village Nampe, Circle- Paniasang, PO and PS Koloriang, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: M/s L T Enterprise Age: Occupation : to be represented by its Power of Attorney Holder Village Lubula PO Damin PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey Distric VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Ors represented by the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papumpare District. 2:The Joint Director Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Development Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 3:The Block Development Officer Age: 0 Occupation : CD Block Huri Damin PO and PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Page No.# 2/3 Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Deputy Commissonr Age: 0 Occupation : Kurung Kumey District PO and PS Koloriang Arunachal Pradesh. 5:M/s Nikja Brothers Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Nikja Yana Village PO and PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Kago Taja, K Tagyang Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (RD),Binter Picha BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 21-02-2025 Mr K. Taja, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition as instructed by his client. Prayer is not opposed to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant