Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47605 (KAR)

SHRI DEVAPPA SHANKAR CHOUGULA v. MR HIDAYATULLAH S/O GULAB MOMIN

MFA/103045/2022 · 2025-09-22

S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12952-DB MFA No. 103045 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL M.F.A. NO. 103045 OF 2022 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SHRI DEVAPPA SHANKAR CHOUGULA, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SHINNAL VILLAGE, TAL: ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591304. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ASHOK A. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. HIDAYATULLAH S/O. GULAB MOMIN, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 3988, KAGAJI GALLI, ATHANI, TAL: ATHANI, DIST. BELAGVI-591304. 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., CTS NO.477/1M-1, 1ST FLOOR, V. A. KALBURGI HALLMARK, BESIDE INDUSIND, BANK DESAI CROSS, PINTO ROAD, HUBLI-580029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S. K. KAYAKAMATH, ADV. FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.09.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.978/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-V, BELAGAVI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12952-DB MFA No. 103045 of 2022 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo reads as under: “Herein the memo on behalf of the appellant is as under: The appeal is no merits hence appeal may be withdrawn as not press.” 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. In view of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE ABK /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1