MAHADEV PRASAD PANDEY @ HARI SHANKAR OM MAHADEV PRASAD PANDEY v. PAWAN KUMAR TULSYAN AND 4 OTHERS
A227/7414/2019 · 2025-05-05
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72614 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7414 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mahadev Prasad Pandey @ Hari Shankar Om Mahadev Prasad Pandey Respondent :- Pawan Kumar Tulsyan And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kshitij Shailendra (Elevated) Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. On 02.01.2024, notice was issued to the sole petitioner to engage another counsel. Office report dated 30th March, 2025 indicates that the said notice has returned undelivered with remark "insufficient address". As the counsel for petitioner has already been elevated to this Bench and notice has returned back with the endorsement
"insufficient address", no purpose would be served in issuing the notice again to engage another counsel. In view of the said fact, writ petition stands dismissed. In case, any cause of action survives, petitioner shall be at liberty to move necessary application for recalling the order. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 SK Goswami Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad