SATYANARAYAN S/O SURAJMAL AGRAWAL v. DILIPSINGH S/O OKHRAM RAHANGDALE
APEAL/234/2009 · 2025-01-17
Shri G A Sanap
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47602 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47602 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 58.appa.491.2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 491 OF 2024 AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 234 OF 2009 Styanarayan S/o. Surajlal Agrawal .vs. Dilipsingh Okhram Rahangdale _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr Ramaswamy Sundaram, Advocate for the appellant
Mr P. V. Bawankar, Adv. h/f. Mr S. V. Purohit, Advocate for respondent No.1
CORAM :
G.A. SANAP
J.
DATE :
JANUARY 17, 2025
Heard.
2. The appellant/applicant has filed this application for compounding the offence punishable under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. It is submitted that as
directed by this Court vide order dated 26.07.2024, the offence is compounded subject to deposit of compounding charges and the electricity bill. The appellant/accused has deposited the compounding charges and electricity bill. Learned Advocate for the respondent confirms the deposit of the amount.
3. In view of this, the application for compounding is allowed. 2025:BHC-NAG:524
2 58.appa.491.2024.odt
4. In view of compounding of the offences, the criminal appeal is allowed.
5. The order of conviction and sentence dated 19.03.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia is set aside.
6. The appellant is acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 135(1) (b) & (c) and Section 135(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003.
7. The criminal application and criminal appeal sand disposed of, accordingly.
(G. A. SANAP, J) Namrata