Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47596 (RAJ)

PURUSHOTTAM BAIRWA @ RAJRAMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/814/2025 · 2025-11-06

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44435] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 814/2025 Purushottam Bairwa @ Rajraman, R/o Shyam Vatika Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 06/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 494/2024 registered at Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor District Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2) & 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the case has primarily been registered under Section 318 of the BNSS, which is triable by the Magistrate. It is further submitted that the dispute arises out of monetary transactions relating to share trading. Learned counsel has further submitted that vide order dated 12.03.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicant subject to the condition that applicant joins investigation. In compliance of the same, the applicant joined investigation as directed. [2025:RJ-JP:44435] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-814/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that matter is triable by Magistrate and considering the fact that the accused-applicant has already joined investigation as directed vide interim order dated 12.03.2025 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 12.03.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor District Jaipur City (North) in F.I.R. No. 494/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Purushottam Bairwa @ Rajraman shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/259