Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47588 (BOM)

ATUL S/O PRABHAKARRAO DALAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AKOLA, THR. ITS COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER

WP/3143/2025 · 2025-07-14

Shri Nitin W Sambre, Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

108-WP-3143-25.odt 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3143 OF 2025 Atul s/o Prabhakarrao Dalal, Near Bhaktidham Mandir, Nagar Parishad Colony, Akola -vs- Municipal Corporation, Akola and ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and the Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri C. A. Joshi, Advocate for petitioner. Shri J. Y. Ghurde, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.2. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : July 14, 2025 P. C. 1. Heard finally with consent of counsel for the parties. 2. Considering the nature of order proposed to be passed, notice to respondent No.1 is dispensed with. 3. We have heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.2. 4. The petitioner claims to have superannuated from the post of Senior Auditor on 31/07/2024 from the establishment of respondent No.1-Municipal Corporation, Akola. It is claimed that the terminal benefits of the petitioner have not been paid in entirety and as such he is before this Court. 5. Having regard to the claim put forth by the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to permit the petitioner to appear before the Commissioner of respondent No.1-Municipal Corporation, Akola on 28/07/2025 with the details as regards his claim for payment of terminal benefits. 6. Once the petitioner appears before the respondent No.1, his claim shall be looked into and shall be decided within a period of six weeks thereafter by issuing appropriate communication. 7. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs. (Sachin S. Deshmukh, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.) Asmita