Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144880
Court No. - 64 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 34035 of 2017 Applicant :- Kaushal Kant Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
3. Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State is present. 4. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant-Kaushal Kant Verma with the following prayers:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned order of N.B.W. dated 16.12.2016 passed by IInd Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Ghaziabad in Complaint Case no. 6937 of 2017 (Sunil Kumar Singh Vs. Kaushal Kant Verma), Under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station-Kavi Nagar, District- Ghaziabad. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceeding of Complaint Case no. 6937 of 2017 (Sunil Kumar Singh Vs. Kaushal Kant Verma), Under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station- Kavi Nagar, District-Ghaziabad, Pending before IInd Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Ghaziabad, during the pendency of present criminal misc. application before this Hon'ble Court, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury, and/or pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case."
5. This matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide order dated 12.10.2017 subject to deposit of Rs. 1,50,000/- by the applicant. As per report of the Mediation Centre dated 7.12.2017, the applicant has not deposited the said money before the Centre till 6.12.2017. 6. In view of the same, this matter is reported by the office through the report dated 4.8.2025 of Registrar (J) (Listing) that it is likely to be infructuous. 7. Perused the records. 8. Since there is no one appearing on behalf of the applicants to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., the matter being likely to have become infructuous by efflux of time, the same is dismissed as such. 9. The present application is dismissed as infructuous. 10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 11. Registrar (Compliance) to communicate this order to the District and Sessions Judge/trial court concerned within a week.
(Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad