[2025:RJ-JP:48378] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13292/2025 Suraj S/o Kanaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ajmera Ki Dhani Mazola Ka Rasta Dungrikala, Police Station Malpura, Distt. Tonk (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Abdul Wahid Naqvi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 0395/2024 registered at Police Station Sarwar District Kekri for the offence(s) under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicant is a young man, aged about 30 years and he has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is submitted that the applicant is behind bars ever since 23.06.2025. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the applicant is having twenty criminal antecedents registered against him. 4. The criminal antecedents of the accused-applicant are reproduced herein below: [2025:RJ-JP:48378] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13292/2025] dz-la- izdj.k la[;k e; dk;eh fnukad /kkjk pkyku la- Fkkuk orZeku fLFkfr 1. 147@2009] 29-08-09 4@6 vkj,ulh ,DV 91@09 31-08-2009 ekyiqjk] ftyk& Vksad & 2. 142@2010 25-08-10 136 fo|qr ,DV 120@10 29-11-2010 ekyiqjk] ftyk&Vksad & 3. 27@2010 13-02-10 136 fo|qr ,DV 185@10 31-10-2010 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 4. 40@2010 04-03-10 136 fo|qr ,DV 226@10 30-11-2010 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 5. 250@2010 15-08-10 136 fo|qr ,DV 212@10 29-11-2010 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 6. 31@2010 18-02-2010 136 fo|qr ,DV 225@10 30-11-2010 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 7. 34@2010 19-02-2010 136 fo|qr ,DV 211@10 29-11-2010 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 8. 221@2010 16-08-2010 136 fo|qr ,DV 214@10 29-11-2010 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 9. 264@2010 26-09-2010 136 fo|qr ,DV 213@10 29-11-2010 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 10. 193@2010 22-07-2010 136 fo|qr ,DV 218@10 30-11-2010 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 11. 194@2011 14-07-2011 302]396]412 Hkk-na-la- 162@11 27-09-2011 VksMkjk;flag] Vksad & 12. 110@2011 09-04-2011 457]380 Hkk-na-la- 201@11 02-11-2011 eqgkuk] ftyk t;iqj & 13. 220@2011 05-07-2011 457]380 Hkk-na-la- 202@11 02-11-2011 eqgkuk] ftyk t;iqj & 14. 142@2012 16-04-2012 460]302]396 Hkk-na-la- 216@12 31-07-2012 pkdlw] ftyk t;iqj & 15. 105@2013 07-06-2013 457]380 Hkk-na-la- 69@13 17-06-2013 fMXxh] ftyk Vksad & 16. 130@2013 12-04-2013 380 Hkk-na-la- 112@13 30-06-2013 nsoyh] ftyk Vksad & 17. 76@2019 09-06-2019 457]380 Hkk-na-la- 94@19 31-10-2019 ipsoj] ftyk Vksad & 18. 319@2022 10-12-2022 419]420]465 120ch Hkk-na- la- 02@23 29-01-2023 ekyiqjk] ftyk Vksad & 19. 320@2023 17-10-2023 3@25 vkElZ ,DV 86@24 27-05-2024 ekyiqjk] ftyk Vksad & [2025:RJ-JP:48378] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13292/2025] 20 106@2024 27-04-2024 341]323]504 Hkk-na-la- 104@24 21-06-2024 ekyiqjk] ftyk Vksad & 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that there is twenty criminal antecedents pending against the applicant and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/55