[2025:RJ-JP:43007] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15877/2025 Dr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma S/o Chandgi Ram Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Behror, Alwar, At Present Working On The Post Of Smo-Ii, Government Ayurvedic Dispensary, Jakhrana, Kotputli-Behror. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda (Ayush), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Deputy Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Director, Nideshalay Ayurved Vibhag, Rajasthan, Ajmer Having Its Office At Ashok Marg, Savitri Chauraha, Ajmer, Rajasthan- 305001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neetu Bhansali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Parth Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner placed reliance upon judgment dated 13.07.2022, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13496/2021 titled as Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and submits that this writ petition be [2025:RJ-JP:43007] (2 of 2) [CW-15877/2025] disposed of in accordance with these judgment, as decided by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned AAG, Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma and he submits that recently a SLP (Civil) filed by State of Rajasthan in bunch of matters, wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court has referred the issue to a larger Bench and till disposal by the larger Bench an interim order was passed and he has no objection in case this writ petition is disposed of in accordance with judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court. 5. Learned AAG further submits that if petitioner is desirous to serve after attaining the age of 60 years, the State may appoint in accordance with terms and conditions as settled by Hon’ble Supreme Court in said judgment. 6. Learned counsel for petitioner is satisfied from the statement made by the learned AAG. 5. Having considered aforesaid and also the judgments as referred hereinabove, the instant writ petition is disposed of on terms as directed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (c) No. 9563 of 2024 order dated 17.10.2025 (State of Raj. And Ors. Vs. Anisur Rahman). The respondents are directed to pass appropriate orders before 30.11.2025. 6. With aforesaid, the instant writ petition stands disposed with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /170-S