Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 849 of 2022 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no cause of action survives in the writ petition and same has become infructuous. Consequently, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 9, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Indrasan Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad