IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 132 CR-2398-2025 Date of Decision.:08.05.2025 Manjit Galhotra and Anr Pe..oners Vs. Vinod Mehra and Others Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the peoners. Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Suit for specific performance filed by respondents herein was decreed by the trial Court on 22.11.2024, against which the defendants of the case (peoners herein) filed appeal. An applicaon was moved for staying the operaon of the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court ll the pendency of the appeal but that request has been declined by the Appellate Court by way of the impugned order dated 10.03.2025, which is assailed before this Court. 2. Though no formal noce of moon has been issued but Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Appellate Court may be directed to dispose of the appeal in a me bound manner and ll the date of the decision, the operaon of the judgment of the Trial Court may be stayed. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.05.08 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-2398-2025 -2- 4. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present revision is hereby disposed of with the direcon to the Appellate Court so as to make every possible effort to decide the main appeal itself on or before 30.11.2025 posively and in the meanme, operaon of the trial Court judgment and decree dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) shall remain stayed. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE May 08, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.05.08 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document