RAJU @ RAJU SABJIWALA S/O RAMLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMA/426/2025 · 2025-09-11
Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47566 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47566 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:36994-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 426/2025 in D. B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No.777/2025 Raju @ Raju Sabjiwala S/o Ramlal, R/o Behind Satyanarayan Mandir, Retwali, Kota, Police Station Kaithunipole, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General, Prison, Jaipur.
2. The State Parole Committee, Through Joint Secretary, Department Of Home, Jaipur.
3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vaishnavi, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Additional Government Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 11/09/2025 Defect pointed out by the Registry is waived. Counsel for the applicant-petitioner submits that this Court, vide order dated 07.08.2025, allowed the writ petition {D. B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No.777/2025} granting second regular parole to the petitioner. Inadvertently, in the said order, period of “twenty” days has been mentioned instead of “thirty” days as provided under the Rules.
[2025:RJ-JP:36994-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-426/2025] In view of above, in the order dated 07.08.2025 passed by this Court in D. B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No.777/2025, period of “twenty” days be read as period of “thirty” days. This order be treated as a part of the order dated
07.08.2025. In that view of the matter, the order dated 07.08.2025 stands accordingly corrected. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/98