[2025:RJ-JP:50604] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19620/2025 Babulal S/o Bridhichand @ Birdaram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Kumharon Ka Mohalla, Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur Presently Working As Cook Ambedkar Hostel, Jamwaramgarh, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Seceretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan Govt. Seceretarait, Jaipur. 2. Director Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Near 22 Godawn, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Jamwaramgah, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships’ may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition and By an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to the respondents be directed to grant the benefit of minimum pay scale to the post of Class IV employee/The petitioner should be considered a Govt. Employee and not an employee of a placement agency. [2025:RJ-JP:50604] (2 of 3) [CW-19620/2025] Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 24.03.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13667/2024 titled as Balu Ram Meena and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court (on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Anokha Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 372/2013). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Balu Ram Meena and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra), if applicable upon facts of the case. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Anokha Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and followed in case of Balu Ram Meena and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the [2025:RJ-JP:50604] (3 of 3) [CW-19620/2025] respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/93