Court No. - 38 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33540 of 2017 Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Sharma,Sudhanshu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Uday Pratap Singh Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondent. 2. The writ petition has been filed for release of requisite funds by the State Government to the respondent-University to clear the revised U.G.C. pay scale to the petitioner and also other monetary benefits. When the respondents have not released the dues, the petitioner has approached this Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.60410 of 2016, the said writ petition was disposed of with the following directions:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Uday Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is being heard and finally decided. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the nature of controversy in issue, the relief as sought in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and without calling for any counter affidavit, the writ petition is being finally disposed off at the admission stage itself with a direction that in case, petitioner files a fresh comprehensive application/representation raising all his grievances before respondent no. 2 with regard to the payment of revised UGC pay scale and its arrears and other benefits along with all relevant documents, a certified copy of this order and a copy of the writ petition within a period of one month from today, the same shall be considered and decided by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 2 months thereafter. With the aforesaid observations/directions the writ petition is finally disposed off. ". 3. Pursuant to the said directions, the petitioner has once again represented before the University for consideration of his case for fixation of revised U.G.C. pay scale and also for release of the monetary benefits to him. 4. Considering the said requests, the University has referred the matter to the first respondents vide its order dated 16.03.2017 and also once again on 11.07.2017 despite the request made by the University for release of the grant, the first respondent has not considered and passe any order so far. 5. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd and 3rd respondent-University, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the request made by the University vide its letters dated 16.03.2017 and 11.07.2017 and to take appropriate action within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 13.5.2025 Neeraj (Donadi Ramesh, J.) Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad