[2025:RJ-JP:42516] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15829/2025 Ratanlal Bairwa S/o Ramdev Bairwa, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village And Post Dhundari, Tehsil Kekri District Ajmer Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Cum Commissioner, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, District Ajmer Rajasthan 3. Shiv Charan Sharma S/o Shri Radheyshyam Sharma, R/o Village And Post Dhundari, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura Mr. Swapnil Singh Patel For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/10/2025 1. Instant Writ Petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:- (a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the action of the respondents of appointing private respondent as Gram Panchayat Sahayak in Gram PanchayatDhundari, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer may kindly be quashed and set aside being in utter disregard of the guidelines issued vide Order dated 18.1.2008 and the respondents may kindly be directed to discontinue services of the private respondent andgive appointment to the petitioner on the said post with all consequential benefits. b) Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:42516] (2 of 2) [CW-15829/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is having requisite qualification for the post of ‘Rojgaar Sahayak’ but to favor and accommodate private respondent, the petitioner has not been selected. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondent Nos.1 and 2 within a period of fourweeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 4. With aforesaid, the writ petition along with pending application(s), if any stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /28