[2025:RJ-JP:50497] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19621/2025 Anshu D/o Shri Satyaprakash, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Ghushyari, Tehsil Bharatpur, District Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur Rajasthan 2. Director General Of Police Rajasthan, Directorate Office, Lal Kothi, Jaipur 3. Additional Director General Of Police (Recruitment And Promotion Board), Rajasthan Jaipur 4. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Commissionerate, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships' may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition; call for and examine entire record of the case and a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to grant two months time to the petitioner for appearing in [2025:RJ-JP:50497] (2 of 3) [CW-19621/2025] PST/PET in pursuance to the Constable Recruitment 2025 advertised under Advertisement dated 9.4.2025. The respondents may kindly be further directed that after conducting PSI/PET if the petitioner found eligible on merits give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Constable Driver Non TSP under General-WE category under the command control of the respondent No.4 in pursuance to the said Advertisement dated 9.4.2025 with consequential benefits. b) Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 24.08.2020 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16652/2019 titled as Nitin Singh Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of UP and Ors. Reported in (2019) 13 SCC 706. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of Nitin Singh Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of UP and Ors. (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:50497] (3 of 3) [CW-19621/2025] 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days with all relevant documents and the respondents-Authority is directed to consider the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Nitin Singh Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of UP and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation decide with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of seven days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then the petitioner is entitled for same benefits. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /36