Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47563 (AP)

Devireddy Janardhan Reddy v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PLICE

WP/5274/2021 · 2025-10-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010091922021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5274/2021 Between: 1. DEVIREDDY JANARDHAN REDDY, S/O PENCHALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50YRS, OCC BUSINESS OF SRI SAMBHAVI INDANE GRAMEEN ANANTHA SAGARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTHASAGARAM POLICE STATION SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5274 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare delay and inaction on the part of respondent No.1 in considering and disposing of the representation dt.16-01-2021 by giving necessary directions to the 2nd respondent to prevent the unsocial elements from supply of Gas cylinders by the petitioner from the Registered Godowns to the customers as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to consider and dispose of the representation dt.16-01-2021 submitted by the petitioner and give necessary directions to the 2nd respondent to prevent the unsocial elements from causing disturbance for supply of Gas cylinders from the Registered Godowns to the customers and pass.…= 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.10.2025. UPS 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5274 of 2021 Dated.16.10.2025 UPS 64